Subject: | Re: Proud Owner of A New Sony D50! |
---|---|
From: | "scratchpaws" scratchpaws |
Date: | Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:17 pm ((PDT)) |
Thanks, John. Way cool. --- In "hartogj" <> wrote= : > > > > I'll be creating nothing but mp3 files, VBR between 170-210 kbps. So wh= at if I come off the 96/24 .wav record setting and drop down to 48/24 or so= mething like that---even 44.1/24? Or, would I have a better quality mp3 fil= e if I stay up at the 96.24 .wav record setting before creating the mp3s? > > 44.1 is plenty. A 96 kHz sample rate will only be useful if you have an i= nterest in the ultrasonic. > > John Hartog > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 1 is plenty. A 96 kHz sample rate will only be useful if you have an int=, Unknown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 1. Re: Incredible Bittern?, chrishails50 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Proud Owner of A New Sony D50!, hartogj |
Next by Thread: | Re: Proud Owner of A New Sony D50!, James Shatto |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU