Re: Mixpre or recorder?

Subject:	Re: Mixpre or recorder?
From:	"jtudor2005" jtudor2005
Date:	Thu Aug 19, 2010 5:26 pm ((PDT))


--- In  Steve Duncan <> wrote:
I must be strange, but I discovered today actually enjoy
> listening to far off construction & traffic noise. I live in
> Milwaukee, near the airport, and they are doing construction on about
> every major road within range of a dead cat swung by the tail.
>
> There are other sounds as well. The far off tire-screech of someone
> avoiding God know's what, a turbo-prop taking off at the airport, lots
> of insects, and later on a few birds.
>
Steve

You should head over to the Phonography list for more information on this s=
ort of sound recording

http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/phonography/messages

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Mixpre or recorder?, Steve Duncan Re: Mixpre or recorder?, oryoki2000 Re: Mixpre or recorder?, Mitch Hill Re: Mixpre or recorder?, James Shatto Re: Mixpre or recorder?, Steve Duncan Re: Mixpre or recorder?, jtudor2005 <= Re: Mixpre or recorder?, Steve Duncan Re: Mixpre or recorder?, jtudor2005

Previous by Date:	Re: Mixpre or recorder?, Steve Duncan
Next by Date:	Re: Mixpre or recorder?, Steve Duncan
Previous by Thread:	Re: Mixpre or recorder?, Steve Duncan
Next by Thread:	Re: Mixpre or recorder?, Steve Duncan
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU