naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sennheiser 80x0 series. was Infrasound microphone

Subject: Re: Sennheiser 80x0 series. was Infrasound microphone
From: "Mike Rooke" picnet2
Date: Mon Aug 9, 2010 6:58 am ((PDT))
Talking of infrasound, heres a snippet from a recording I made last night d=
uring a passing storm:

http://soundcloud.com/urlme/plane-and-thunder

Use the down arrow in the player to grab the FLAC for analysis purposes.

PIPMICS, capsules mounted just near the ears of a Sennheiser MZK2002 dummy =
head, or in many regards an artefact from the 80's.

Hows the low end response?

Recorder: Sony D50.

BR
Mike.


--- In  Dan Dugan <> wrote:
>
> >> Before taking the plunge into expensive mics, I'd consider buying a
> >> pair of AT04022's and start experimenting with array options. Arrays
> >> make a huge difference and it takes a while to learn what the
> >> strength and weaknesses of the various options are. The low end
> >> response of the AT4022's is on par with mkh's.  Rob D.
> >>
> >
> > Sorry for the delay.  As previously stated, at the bottom of every AT m=
ic spec sheet is the clause:
> >
> > -----
> > Avoid leaving the microphone in the open sun or in areas where temperat=
ures exceed 110F (43C) for extended periods.  Extremely high humidity shoul=
d also be avoided.
> > -----
> >
> > If it wasn't for the environmental concern, I would very much like a pa=
ir of those.  But I live in Texas and it's going to be 100F+ everyday this =
week.  And my intent is all weather recording.  Including rain and/or direc=
t sunlight.  Not that I've fully figured that one out yet.  But I have a fe=
w ideals.  90%+ of my recorded content happens outdoors.
> >
> > Don't get me wrong, I am a big fan of AT mics.  I've owned 3 of them, a=
nd still have two of those.  But I live in Texas.  And at $500 per channel,=
 that's a risk I'd rather not take.  From what I recall of the MKH mics the=
y're rated somewhere near 160F.  Or I could be wrong.  110F just doesn't cu=
t it where I live.  Maybe that's not a real spec and AT is just being cauti=
ous.  But if it is a real spec, that one is a deal breaker.
>
> I have six AT-3032s plus two extra capsules (the threads are glued but th=
ey can be removed...). I usually leave them out overnight in the recording =
location. Of the nine or ten capsules I have had experience with three or f=
our have developed sputters when cold or damp. They will replace them in th=
e warranty period (don't wrench the capsules off till the warranty expires)=
. I think last time I bought a capsule only they charged $70 for it.
>
> -Dan
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU