naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Post processing noise reduction...

Subject: Re: Post processing noise reduction...
From: "Mike Rooke" picnet2
Date: Fri Jul 9, 2010 11:39 am ((PDT))
General problem with them all is they are fixed, meaning the offending samp=
le is presented, its filtered out and that small section is applied for the=
 rest of the recording. Whats really needed is a temporal EQ where EQ is pr=
esent at a specific granularity, every second, minute, or right down to mil=
liseconds and blended between 'temporal EQ frames'. Tracking / learning EQ =
with noise reduction - except Ive not found one yet :( Even EQ plug'ins app=
lied on a track affect that track while its active, imagine if you could bl=
end frames of EQ over the whole track adjusting for situations where e.g tr=
affic volume increases or decreases. Or maybe such a thing exists?

-M



--- In  Dan Dugan <> wrote:
>
> My advice is to concentrate on making good recordings and forget about no=
ise reduction software. I have some of the most expensive packages and it's=
 still a PITA and the recordings suffer. That kind of software is useful fo=
r production where you're going to mix an ambience back in to cover the unn=
atural sound.
>
> -Dan
>








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU