Subject: | 4. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size |
---|---|
From: | "umashankar" umashanks |
Date: | Wed May 19, 2010 9:12 am ((PDT)) |
i disagree. the real advantage of 24 bit is in capture. the extra dynamic r= ange=A0 - there is some, only not 144 db of it - really makes it possible t= o do very good field recordings. think of setting up so the loudest sound= =A0will not overload and be sure even of the quietest ambience is captureed= above noise level. changing to 24 bit later on provides nothing.=A0and if = some processing requires a larger number of bits (as=A0 in some kinds of fi= ltering) software these days scales the samples automatically to create the= headroom. most software mixes can be set to be done in 32 bit, for=A0 inst= ance umashankar =A0i have published my poems. you can read (or buy) at http://stores.lulu.c= om/umashankar |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 3. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Nature Recordists] Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sampl=, Scott Fraser |
Previous by Thread: | 4. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size, Paul Jacobson |
Next by Thread: | 4. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size, Scott Fraser |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU