Subject: | 4. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size |
---|---|
From: | "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser |
Date: | Thu May 20, 2010 7:54 am ((PDT)) |
<<The larger formats people are proposing involve a 50%-300% increase in long-term storage requirements. Aside from time and money,>> With 1 terabyte drives now commonly available under $100 I think the money part of the equation is working in favor of storing large bit depth & word length files. Time is more precious, since each cloning, exportation, process, etc, takes longer. << there are material-ecological consequences.>> Valid point. With large format SSD's right around the corner, in terms of price & capacity, are we soon to see our landfills thick with mechanical hard drive mechanisms? Maybe they can be melted down & reutilized. Scott Fraser |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 3. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size, Scott Fraser |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 5. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | 4. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size, umashankar |
Next by Thread: | 4. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size, justinasia |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU