Subject: | 9. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size |
---|---|
From: | "Paul Jacobson" thebrunswicktwitcher |
Date: | Tue May 18, 2010 9:35 pm ((PDT)) |
On 19/05/2010, at 1:15 PM, Dan Dugan wrote: > John is a good friend, but he also is in the business of selling higher-s= ample-rate recorders...note the weasely "appear to reconstitute." No real d= ata to support the claim. There is an interesting paper from a manufacturer at the other end of the c= hain - dcs http://www.dcsltd.co.uk - entitled "A Suggested Explanation For = (Some Of) The Audible Differences Between High Sample Rate And Conventional= Sample Rate Audio Material" This appears to have been presented to the AES= NY in 1997. www.cirlinca.com/include/aes97ny.pdf Again no real data to support the claims, but at least this paper explores = some possible mechanisms which might explain the improvements in sound qual= ity many people claim to hear with "hi-res" recordings. cheers Paul |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 8. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size, Paul Jacobson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 10. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size, Jeremiah Moore |
Previous by Thread: | 8. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size, Paul Jacobson |
Next by Thread: | 10. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size, Jeremiah Moore |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU