naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

10. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size

Subject: 10. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size
From: "Jeremiah Moore" jeremiahmoore99
Date: Tue May 18, 2010 11:18 pm ((PDT))
I've been involved in a few sample-rate shootouts and comparison sessions.
 Those several experiences showed, to my ears, some subjective merit to
recording at 96K.

Another listening test was between DSD and a PCM-decimated version of the
same recording.  These were exquisitely recorded acoustic music sessions,
presented at a mastering studio called Airshow in Boulder CO.  The DSD
sounded better.  But it's not the same signal path.  To listen to the PCM,
you have to listen through a PCM converter.  (a DSD D-A converter is simply
a lowpass filter, very simple electronically).  So there's a variable --
which PCM converter?

At any rate, I record at 48/24 except I record 96K for some FX work.  I wor=
k
in film and video.  Material rarely if ever goes to CD.  I would second the
earlier comment about conversion time; this can be significant and is a
reason to choose your sample rate carefully.

24 bit makes a big difference when you're boosting quiet material.  Even
capturing the noise of the recorder with more bits is good.

-jeremiah



On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Paul Jacobson <> wrote:

>
>
>
> On 19/05/2010, at 1:15 PM, Dan Dugan wrote:
>
> > John is a good friend, but he also is in the business of selling
> higher-sample-rate recorders...note the weasely "appear to reconstitute."=
 No
> real data to support the claim.
>
> There is an interesting paper from a manufacturer at the other end of the
> chain - dcs http://www.dcsltd.co.uk - entitled "A Suggested Explanation
> For (Some Of) The Audible Differences Between High Sample Rate And
> Conventional Sample Rate Audio Material" This appears to have been presen=
ted
> to the AES NY in 1997.
>
> www.cirlinca.com/include/aes97ny.pdf
>
> Again no real data to support the claims, but at least this paper explore=
s
> some possible mechanisms which might explain the improvements in sound
> quality many people claim to hear with "hi-res" recordings.
>
> cheers
> Paul
>
>
>



--
-----------------------------------------------------------
jeremiah moore | SOUND | 
http://www.jeremiahmoore.com/









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • 10. Re: Choosing the right sampling rate and sample size, Jeremiah Moore <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU