I think it is possible to teach someone with appropriate aptitudes but
with no previous experience to do a focussed professional task not
involving special motor/language/etc skills to a reasonable level in a
very short time - usually no more than an hour or so, maybe a few days
for more complex things. Of course there is no way that you can teach
someone to become an experienced boom microphone operator in a short
time, but the idea is simply to avoid basic blunders.
Given that budget restraints mean that one person has to be both the
sound recordist and the producer, which is the easier way to
cross-train? Is it easier to train a skilled sound recordist to be an
effective producer or to train an experienced producer to become a
competent sound recordist?
It seems that the problem with the soundtrack on the "Behind the Scenes"
video was that it was a bodged job. Unless I missed something there was
a stereo recording from the hand-held boom mic, the presenter had a
lavalier mic, and there might have been some recording from the camera
position. The lav feed was then dumped onto either the right or left
channel without any obvious attempt to balance the result - sometimes it
is on one side, sometimes on the other. The words from the other
participants seem to come from the boom stereo recording only.
I listened to Episode 2 Series 14 of "Ramblings", and that seemed to be
nicely balanced between the voices of the presenter and the other
participants. Also an interesting use of fade-outs to short periods of
silence which made the background noise (mostly traffic - the UK seems
to be a difficult place to get away from traffic noise!) in the majority
of the sections more bearable over the course of the programme. Maybe
different people did audio post-production work in each case?
Have I missed anything important? Am just starting with audio recording
and am keen to learn as much as I can.
Richard
Philip Tyler wrote:
>
>
> The 'sound recordist' is also the producer, in these days of saving
> money you have to turn your hand at anything.
> Or rather it's the Producer who also records the sound. It hardly ever
> happens the other way round!
>
> I was on the receiving end of some recordings made by a producer which
> he had recorded from around the UK's coast line. Would have been nice
> if he had used a wind shield of some sort!
>
> Even he was unhappy with the results once he heard them! It never
> occured to him that's what the headphones in the kit were for!
>
> Phil
>
> On 17 Feb 2010, at 11:18, "Max" <
> <maxcatterwell%40o2.co.uk>> wrote:
>
> I see what you mean about the cable Mike, you'd think a pro would have
> a selection of lengths wouldn't you? Also, it didn't look as though
> that hairy had been combed in a long time! I didn't notice a
> particularly 'glorious sound quality' either.
> Max
>
> --- In
> <naturerecordists%40yahoogroups.com>, "Mike Rooke" <> wrote:
> >
> > interesting to see, Id tidy up the dangling cable from the blimp tho :)
> >
> > --- In
> <naturerecordists%40yahoogroups.com>, "amflmnt" <amflmnt@> wrote:
> > >
> > > A nice little piece getting to see some of what goes on behind the
> scenes for the BBC Radio4 "Ramblings". Also interesting to get to hear
> the raw recording.
> > >
> > > Scroll down to the bottom of the page to find the video clip.
> > >
> > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006xrr2
> <http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006xrr2>
> > >
> >
>
|