naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

1. Re: sound editing software

Subject: 1. Re: sound editing software
From: "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio
Date: Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:02 am ((PDT))
At 7:07 PM +1100 10/13/09, Paul Jacobson wrote:
>On 13/10/2009, at 2:55 PM, Rob Danielson wrote:
>
>>  Paul--
>>  I think the terminology was confusing me. The "layers" are "stacked"
>>  plugs in one stereo track and the settings used to output a file can
>>  be saved as as .wedt doc. Being able to go back later and tweak plug
>>  setting is very useful.
>>
>>  The kind of editing and mixing I was referring to does require
>>  working with a good number of stereo tracks, "sliding" them around in
>>  time, inserting effects plugs and volume/pan settings on each track
>>  and then mixing out to stereo or surround.
>
>Hi Rob,
>
>The difficulty seems to be that Wave Editor visualises data using
>Photoshop style layers vs the more usual mixing desk schema.
>
>The best way I can think to explain the layers is that the base
>channels - a stereo pair in this case but could be 24 channel if you
>had the need - are the equivalent of the master output bus in a "mixer
>style" audio app. The layers are roughly the equivalent of stereo
>tracks (you can insert multichannel audio into layers) but they are
>stacked above the base channels rather than being laid out like as
>parallel "lanes". In the end you are looking at the similar types of
>information presented in quite different ways.
>
>The content of the WE layers can be slid around in time and with a
>plug like Sonalksis's Free G 
><http://www.sonalksis.com/index.php?section_id=99>http://www.sonalksis.com/index.php?section_id=99
>you can add volume/pan functionality to Wave Editor's layers. I do
>admit this is probably bending Wave Editor to a task it wasn't really
>intended to do.
>
>cheers
>Paul
>

Hi Paul--
Indeed that would be a creative approach to mixing :-). I like the 
challenge of imagining the time structure of my mix entirely in my 
head!  I think your comment that its best designed for mastering and 
format conversion is a good one.  Plug "stacking" is pretty common. I 
believe its been in Peak for years, but the ability to save all the 
plug settings in a doc file seems unique among other lower cost apps 
I can think of at the moment.

I've used the (SE3-like) version of Cubase and it was stable and easy 
to use on Mac. I bet one could find that on eBay for a song or even 
get it free with an audio interface. Rob D.

-- 









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU