Subject: | Fwd: Re: [Nature Recordists] Surround Array Design, was Re: Do we st |
---|---|
From: | "wildlifeanalysis" wildlifeanalysis |
Date: | Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:36 am ((PDT)) |
> As I think about it, another option is a pair of the AT4022 omni's. > They're spec'd at 13 dB(A) self-noise which is a good match for your > MKH's. Their actual self-noise performance might be lower like the > 3203's capsules. In either case, you really don't need ultra low > noise mics for recording in the tropics :-). I see one dealer has the > AT4022's specially priced: http://tinyurl.com/p7llev If you buy the > mics from a conscientious dealer with good inventory, they can > exchange a troublesome mic faster than Tech Support. Are the AT4022's known to have good resistance to humidity? D |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Cricket chorus and scree fall, hartogj |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Sound Devices MP-2 for sale on the concert tapers board, Brian Dasilva |
Previous by Thread: | Fwd: Re: [Nature Recordists] Surround Array Design, was Re: Do we st, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Sennheiser MKH ramblings/questions..., jeswaaaa |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU