Subject: | Re: CS-3 v AR-7 |
---|---|
From: | "Matt Blaze" matthew.blaze |
Date: | Sat Sep 5, 2009 7:39 pm ((PDT)) |
Count me as another satisfied user of the porta-brace (for a 744, same form factor as the 722). Just enough padding without adding much extra bulk and openings in all the right places. I like the easy access to the rear panel, and you can attach a small case for a mixpre or 322 mixer to the front if you want. -matt On Sep 5, 2009, at 20:18, geoffjcarey wrote: > Does anybody have any advice as to which is the better of the two? > > I recently bought the SD722, which I use for field recording, and > don't need to carry much else around in the case, apart from a > notebook, spare battery and small external speaker/cable. > > Geoff Carey > > > > ------------------------------------ > > "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a > sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie > Krause > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: CS-3 v AR-7, dannymeltzer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Low Cost Digital Recorders, ndbdxr |
Previous by Thread: | Re: CS-3 v AR-7, dannymeltzer |
Next by Thread: | Re: CS-3 v AR-7, Jeremiah Moore |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU