Subject: | 1. Re: Bats (was High Sample Rates) |
---|---|
From: | "animalsounds" animalsounds |
Date: | Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:26 am ((PDT)) |
Hi again, I just wanted to show how Common Pipistrelle echolocation calls can look li= ke when they are recorded under optimal conditions by using specialized ult= rasound recording gear: http://www.avisoft.com/sounds/pipistr4.gif http://www.avisoft.com/sounds/pipistr1.gif http://www.avisoft.com/sounds/pipistr3.gif http://www.avisoft.com/sounds/Pipistrellus_pipistrellus.gif The following spectrogram shows a Soprano Pipistrelle echolocation call tha= t exhibits a higher end frequency: http://www.avisoft.com/sounds/soprano.gif More bat sounds can be found at http://www.avisoft.com/sounds.htm#bats Regards, Raimund > http://www.mikeoates.org/wildlife/img/sonogram-bat.jpg > While I am here, can anyone identify this bat from the image, I believe i= t's a Pipistrelle > but it has a higher frequency than other sonograms I have seen, could it = be a Soprano > Pipistrelle? > > Mike |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Edirol R-09HR vs Zoom H4n (built in mics), oryoki2000 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 2. Re: Bats (was High Sample Rates), Michael Oates |
Previous by Thread: | Bird call recognition software, simmosonics |
Next by Thread: | 2. Re: Bats (was High Sample Rates), Michael Oates |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU