Raimund,
Many thanks for your help in identifying my bat recording and for these ext=
ra sources of
comparison data.
Regards,
Mike
>Hi again,
>
>I just wanted to show how Common Pipistrelle echolocation calls can look l=
ike when they are recorded under optimal conditions by using specialized ul=
trasound recording gear:
>
>http://www.avisoft.com/sounds/pipistr4.gif
>http://www.avisoft.com/sounds/pipistr1.gif
>http://www.avisoft.com/sounds/pipistr3.gif
>http://www.avisoft.com/sounds/Pipistrellus_pipistrellus.gif
>
>The following spectrogram shows a Soprano Pipistrelle echolocation call th=
at exhibits a higher end frequency:
>
>http://www.avisoft.com/sounds/soprano.gif
>
>More bat sounds can be found at http://www.avisoft.com/sounds.htm#bats
>
>Regards,
>Raimund
>
>
>> http://www.mikeoates.org/wildlife/img/sonogram-bat.jpg
>
>> While I am here, can anyone identify this bat from the image, I believe =
it's a Pipistrelle
>> but it has a higher frequency than other sonograms I have seen, could it=
be a Soprano
>> Pipistrelle?
>>
>
>> Mike
>
|
