Subject: | Re: Edirol R-09HR vs Zoom H4n (built in mics) |
---|---|
From: | "Heather Perkins" landonewts |
Date: | Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:40 am ((PDT)) |
I don't know how the Zoom H4 is, but I'm assuming the basic layout and build is similar to the Zoom H2. I played with an H2 recently, and really didn't like it. YMMV, but I'd go for the Edirol, or the Olympus LS10.... - H On Aug 20, 2009, at 11:18 AM, ndbdxr wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I have another question. I've seen (or rather, heard) the side by > side site. But, if you don't mind, I would just like to get a > couple more first hand experiences, please. > I glanced at a post on another web-based audio forum, where one guy > stated "the zoom H4 mics are better than the Edirol R-09HR." > But that got me thinking: what about the Zoom H4N, now? > > Anyway, I believe I've pretty much narrowed my next purchase down > to these two: Edirol R-09HR or Zoom H4n. Was doing more research > last night, and was just about settled on the Edirol (I don't think > I can wait for the new Sony, by the way). So, again my main concern > is the built in mics of these units. > > Thanks a lot, > > Al > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Edirol R-09HR vs Zoom H4n (built in mics), Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Edirol R-09HR vs Zoom H4n (built in mics), animalsounds |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Edirol R-09HR vs Zoom H4n (built in mics), Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Re: Edirol R-09HR vs Zoom H4n (built in mics), animalsounds |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU