At 3:20 PM -0700 8/17/09, Dan Dugan wrote:
>
>
>Steve Pelikan, you wrote,
>
>>=A0 the question of archiving recordings so that future researchers can
>>=A0 learn about and get access to them and get the associated data is a
>>=A0 significant one. The current best approach I know of is to donate or
>>=A0 make plans to donate to one of the acoustics archives associated
>>=A0 with a university or museum. Many have long-term plans to protect
>>=A0 their data. In this context of future researchers, detailed field
>>=A0 notes about the recording might be even more valuable than the 2x or
>>=A0 4x samples. I've often though of adopting a scheme to put data
>>=A0 =3Dpossibly large bits of text, photos, other documentation- into the
>>=A0 sound file itself. Something like RIFF would let us do that, I guess.
>
>I agree, archiving in an institution with useful metadata is the most
>valuable thing we can do. No one will listen to a recording unless
>they know what's on it.
>
>I'm trying to figure out how to create a workflow for efficiently
>annotating long unattended recordings. I'd like to be able to scan a
>spectrogram of the whole file, drop markers with text labels, and then
>automatically produce a table of contents from the markers that gives
>the position of each marker in absolute time from the beginning of the
>file. I think this text data could be saved back to the header of
>the .wav file so it would be self-documenting. I'd like it to be able
>to show all channels summed or multiple channels in parallel. And do
>it on a Mac.
>
>For years I've been using markers in Pro Tools, but they have no legs;
>they are only good in Pro Tools. Pro Tools has no spectrogram display,
>and the markers can't be printed out, or referenced to the start of
>the file.
>
>iZotope Rx gives me a nice spectrogram of the file, and has markers,
>but the markers have to be edited in a separate step and can't be
>exported or printed.
>
>Soundtrack Pro might be able to do something like this, but when I
>loaded an hour-long stereo file and switched to spectrogram display,
>it took a long time to calculate the spectrogram and then it took
>forever to do -anything-, even to pull down the help menu! This is on
>a Mac Pro with four processors. I had to give up.
>
>Suggestions?
>
>-Dan Dugan
>
Hi Dan--
Have you tried Amadeus Pro?=A0 It has robust meta tag capability, text
markers (exported as a .txt file with times from the start), handles
long recordings very well with a pretty quick sonogram option. Good
batch processing features. The .txt file can be converted to a
database-compatible format. The author has been very helpful with
some bugs I've encountered.
Would it be useful if the generated table of contents had playable
links? QuickTime Reference "movies"=A0 are the only solution I know of
for this feature. I bet someone could write an Applescript to take an
Amadeus Markers list and produce QT reference movie links.=A0 A script
to insert a sonogram as a still image to a Reference movie (sound)
should also be doable.
As for hybrid stereo/surround playback, iTunes will play QuickTime
Normal & Reference movies in stereo and surround.=A0 Once on a server,
stereo and surround files will also play in a browser on Mac (and
supposedly Windows with QT installed and configured). Here's a link
to 4 channel surround file I recorded last night. You can see if it
plays in your browser the way your audio card is currently configured:
http://tinyurl.com/npck3g (43 mb QuickTime)
(If not, here's the OS/card adjustment for mac OS X:=A0 Audio/Midi
set-up (an app in the Utilities folder) ->=A0 Default Output (Select
your 4+ channel card); Properties For (Select your 4+ channel card);
Configure Speakers -> Multi-channel -> Left Front =3D 1; Right Front =3D
2; Left Surround =3D3 and Right Surround =3D 4; Center 5 and LFE=3D6. Click=
"Apply."=A0 Sorry, I'm not sure how to do this configuration on PC with
QuickTime installed and a multi-channel card connected to four or
more speakers-- but it should be doable. Might try Firefox too?)
Here's a 2.6K "Reference" movie which should play only a part of the
above longer file (in 4 ch surround): http://tinyurl.com/mnbdwu
QT handles Amadeus' markers. AP also has good batch processing.
For me, the tallest unknown is the database side-- I want to be able
to "drop" a prepped sound file into the database (with tags or linked
to other data otherwise) and have the associated documentation
generated automatically in both the on-line and off-line formations.
There's still a lot of work in my daily "flow" at present.=A0 I'm just
trying to do it consistently so the conversion process will be fairly
uniform if not=A0 swift.
Anyone, maybe the subject-line should describe this new discussion if
you wish to continue?=A0 Rob D.
--
------------------------------------
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause
Yahoo! Groups Links
|