High Sample Rates

["Curt Olson" flipov411]

We've discussed sample rates here before. If I remember right, some
people claim they can hear a difference between 44.1/48 and 88.2/96 or
192, but others say no.

My question is not about that, but about the future. In cases where we
might be documenting soundscape data for future reference, do you all
think we should we make an effort to capture the highest possible
sample rates -- just because we can? Or can we be confident we're
serving future users well with 44.1/48 recordings?

Curt Olson