Subject: | Re: EQ audio plugin |
---|---|
From: | "justinasia" justinasia |
Date: | Mon Jun 29, 2009 7:33 am ((PDT)) |
Thanks for everyone's advice. I am meaning to get back to some people (sorry for my delay) but now I'll just respond to this: > Which is why I opted also for Amadeus pro, shame it doest have a >real time > plug in architecture the same as waveeditor - but for >editing without eq its > far faster. And the sonogram feature is worth >the asking price alone. I have also noticed how the sonogram is good with Amadeus Pro, and how that is missing in Wave Editor. I noticed that the sonogram also works fine with the trial of Amadeus Pro, so I just open a file with that if I want the sonogram function. Very handy. Justin |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: EQ audio plugin, picnet2 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Hello all!, brucethehoon |
Previous by Thread: | Re: EQ audio plugin, picnet2 |
Next by Thread: | city bird iD, Michael Raphael |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU