Not to keep going with this, but from what little I know, Stieiner
was a work in process. When his followers took his methods and ideas
and applied them, they got frozen in one state and were never allowed
to evolve further... thus became swiftly dysfunctional, mere rules,
not a developing science (or into science, perhaps.) any more.
<L>
Lou Judson =95 Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689
On Mar 17, 2009, at 2:14 AM, Raimund Specht wrote:
> Dan, you wrote:
>
>> That way lies madness. I've studied "Goethean Science" in my critique
>> of Waldorf schools.
>>
>>> Here's a link which mentions this topic of qualitative science:
>>> http://www.natureinstitute.org/qual/index.htm
>>
>> Dressed up, but what they're about is Rudolf Steiner's "spiritual
>> science."
>
> I'm also very skeptical regarding this kind of "science". I have
> had some personal experience with the anthroposophical (holistic)
> medicine developed by Rudolph Steiner. Twenty years ago I had a
> severe illness and received a conventional therapy (which proved to
> be successful). At that time, my mother also dragged me to an
> anthroposophical doctor because she believed that this might be a
> good complementary treatment. However, we were very much surprised
> that this "doctor" recommended to cancel the conventional therapy
> and to switch over completely to his own therapy which mainly
> consisted of a bunch of natural prescriptions whose efficacy is not
> proven at all. In other words, trusting those guys can be indeed
> dangerous=85
>
> Regards,
> Raimund
|