naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Cooper

Subject: Re: Cooper
From: "Michael Raphael"
Date: Sun Mar 15, 2009 3:28 pm ((PDT))
I didn't mean to open up a big debate here.  I enjoyed the sound of
the cooper and it sounded different than the 744 pres to my ears.  I
didn't take detailed notes so i don't plan on making  some convincing
argument for why everyone should be using one.  I just enjoyed the
sound more than the 744T.  And yes, I do enjoy coloration at times.

On Mar 15, 2009, at 1:31 PM, Dan Dugan wrote:

> > Since I don't own a CS104 that will be hard. I wish i could say that
> > I do, but I don't. I have a schoeps MS rig with an mk4 for the mid
> > and I occasionally use and MK41. I am not much of an audiofile,
> but I
> > heard a discernible difference. Maybe calling my 744T pres trash was
> > a little extreme. They are very solid and quiet, but when I pugged
> > into the cooper, I found it just sounded a fair bit fuller and had a
> > bit more low frequency presence. It just had character, which I
> > wouldn't say for the 744T. My Sound Devices MP-2 even has a bit more
> > character in my mind than the 744 just to give you an idea of
> where I
> > am coming from.
>
> A level difference (increase) of a couple of dB would easily give the
> impression of "fuller and a bit more low frequency presence."
>
> -Dan Dugan
>
>










<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU