> I used this microphone in live application and it was quiet noisy
> which is logical for a dynamic (Maybe the microphone was faulty).
> I'd be interested to find out what type of recordings were made
> using the 900 and why using a dynamic rather than a condenser or
> electret.
I expect it was applied to sound reinforcement, most likely theater,
and to film and video work. This was before phantom power became common.
It will need the quietest preamp, and even with that isn't likely to
produce a good signal-to-noise ratio because of the low output of
dynamics in that day.
-Dan Dugan
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|