Subject: | 10. Re: Mono v. Stereo |
---|---|
From: | "Raimund Specht" animalsounds |
Date: | Thu Jan 1, 2009 1:48 am ((PST)) |
Raimund Specht wrote: >The narrower receiving >angle of the shotgun microphone would effectively attenuate >disturbing noise arriving from other directions, which would not be >the case for the much wider receiving angle of the stereo microphone. John Hartog replied: >Couldn't you still achieve that with MS stereo using the shotgun as >mid? Yes John, that would be probably a valid option. I aldreay tried that, but was not satisfied with the results. MS obviously works best with an omni as mid. I'm also afraid that (from the perspective of a scientific researcher) the resulting minor stereo imaging advantages do not justify the additional efforts (weight, cabling and cost). Bye the way, it's not easy to construct a mechanically rugged and reliable MS shotgun microphone system. Regards, Raimund |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 9. Re: Mono v. Stereo, Raimund Specht |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 11. Re: Mono v. Stereo, Raimund Specht |
Previous by Thread: | 9. Re: Mono v. Stereo, Raimund Specht |
Next by Thread: | 11. Re: Mono v. Stereo, Raimund Specht |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU