| Subject: | Re: Cricket Recording - But querying included bats |
|---|---|
| From: | "John Hartog" hartogj |
| Date: | Sun Dec 28, 2008 9:11 am ((PST)) |
Hi Wil, Yes, that does help. Thanks for clarifying. A frequency analysis a louder section of the sounds in question suggests the peak frequency is 12K. Might you, being an insect sounds expert, have an opinion on John Tudor's mystery? Bat or Insect? John Hartog --- In Wil Hershberger <> wrote: > > The peak frequency is the frequency at which the most sonic energy is > produced for said species. It is not the maximum frequency that the > species can produce as that is well above the equipments upper limit > for a number of species. > I hope that this helps. > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 2. Re: impossibility of silence, Gianni Pavan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Cricket Recording - But querying included bats, John Hartog |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Cricket Recording - But querying included bats, John Tudor |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Cricket Recording - But querying included bats, John Hartog |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU