naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Schoeps Double M/S - any experience?

Subject: Re: Schoeps Double M/S - any experience?
From: "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio
Date: Tue Dec 16, 2008 9:53 am ((PST))
At 12:28 PM +0000 12/16/08, losangelesprofessor wrote:
>I use the Schoeps CMIT Double M/S with a CCM 41 for the back and a
>788T Sound Devices. I then process in Pro-Tools, first making all the
>mics equally sensitive by cutting the gains appropriately, adding and
>subtracting to get LRLsRs (and to divide by 2 in M+S/2,

Are you using the Schoeps plug or making the patches in your 
software-mixer? Or maybe your using one of the Schoeps boxes in the 
field?

>  it seems best to reduce the sum by 4.5 dB rather than 6dB, 
>following Tom Holman's
>advice), and then using Compressor making a Dolby Digital 5.1 ac3 file
>with those four tracks (no center) (see Wittek's article on the
>Schoeps site). It works beautifully.

With four channels available on my recorder, I used a common fig 8 
mic for the side, two front/rear omnis (not cardioid) and 
experimented using a fourth omni mic pointed up which I panned to 
center (in 5.1) and moved the speaker over head in the installation. 
There are many M-S options in post which is good.  Did you every try 
using another, spatially separated fig 8 mic for the rear channels? 
Seems like it could be good option to have some timing differences to 
also employ in a surround mix reproducing a large setting,.. to use 
that fourth channel for something,.. Rob D.






-- 




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU