naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

3. Re: Reference question

Subject: 3. Re: Reference question
From: "Bernie Krause" bigchirp1
Date: Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:56 am ((PDT))
Well put, Curt.

BK

On Sep 15, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Curt Olson wrote:

> Bernie Krause wrote:
>
> > ...that gets back to my original question, James. What's the
> > distinction between "realism" and "impressionism?"
>
> I'll chime in to say that the term "realism" sends my thinking along
> the lines of targeted species recordings and fairly straight-ahead
> ambient soundscapes, while "impressionism" brings to mind more
> abstract
> "sound art" that may include bits and pieces of the above along with
> possibly other sound elements and often more extreme processing.
>
> Bernie wisely concluded:
>
> > One (in sound) is either a good illusionist, or not. To me nothing
> > about the end product matters more.
>
> This point has been made here many times before that sound
> recording is
> entirely an illusion. I suspect that perhaps one thing that makes
> for a
> good illusionist in this craft might be managing the expectations of
> the listener by the totality of how a recording is packaged and
> presented.
>
> Curt Olson
>
>
>

Wild Sanctuary
POB 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677
http://www.wildsanctuary.com

Google Earth zooms: http://earth.wildsanctuary.com
SKYPE: biophony










<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU