Subject: | 4. Re: Reference question |
---|---|
From: | "Bernie Krause" bigchirp1 |
Date: | Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:51 am ((PDT)) |
that gets back to my original question, James. What's the distinction between "realism" and "impressionism?" BK On Sep 14, 2008, at 10:45 AM, mopani_wyness wrote: > I've been looking into this area in some depth as part of my > research and practice. Nothing groundbreaking has popped up that I > can think of. The best thinking (and reading) IMO comes from > contemporary photographic discourse (interesting that the term > 'framing' seems so appropriate in relation to sound work), much of > which is applicable to the aesthetics of a lot of current natural > soundscape practice. Personally I'm fond of the notions multi- > discursivity and of the idea of 'listening through' to the real. > > James > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 3. Re: Reference question, mopani_wyness |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 5. Re: Reference question, mopani_wyness |
Previous by Thread: | 3. Re: Reference question, mopani_wyness |
Next by Thread: | 4. Re: Reference question, John Hartog |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU