naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

3. Re: mkh hiss in quiet locations...

Subject: 3. Re: mkh hiss in quiet locations...
From: "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio
Date: Sun Sep 7, 2008 11:23 pm ((PDT))
At 7:55 PM -0700 9/7/08, Lou Judson wrote:
>Following this thread loosely, and looking at the spec sheet is it
>possible the treble boost was on for the recording with the hiss? The
>curve matches the complaint pretty clearly.
>
>Just a thought. I cannot interpret the noise spec at all, looks
>confusing to me!
>
><L>
>
>On Sep 4, 2008, at 9:46 PM, Rob Danielson wrote:
>
>>  I looked at Sennheiser's current spec sheet and
>>  they seem to have new figures or at least a new
>>  format:
>>
>><http://www.sennheiserusa.com/newsite/pdfs/mkh60.pdf>http://www.sennheise=
rusa.com/newsite/pdfs/mkh60.pdf
>>  The units/standards are a little hard to
>>  interpret. Maybe someone can interpret more
>  > confidently than I.
>

Hi Lou,
Could be. Did we hear from Juan Carlos about which "tc digital
preamp" he used?  I think treble emphasis would have to be in effect
with MKH-60's and not with the NT1-A. I don't believe there's a HF
emphasis option in dobroide's recording set-up.

I do think its fairly clear that a rating of 10dB(A) self-noise (or
higher) for both MKH-60's is more consistent with both tests than
6dB(A) self-noise would be. There are some inconsistencies in the
tests that prevent me from reaching any conclusions at this point.
Maybe we'll have to leave the question open pending other clues.  Rob
D.
--






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU