Subject: | 2. Re: mkh hiss in quiet locations... |
---|---|
From: | "Walter Knapp" waltknapp |
Date: | Sun Sep 7, 2008 9:28 pm ((PDT)) |
Posted by: "Rob Danielson" > > Even if one manages to > completely remove them, as Walt points out, the effective noise > performance in the field can vary because some natural locations have > high frequencies that will mask some or all of the self-noise. I don't believe that's what I said at all. What I'm saying is that indoor noise fields are not representative of outdoor ones. Certainly not so for mic testing purposes. Note that high frequencies attenuate with distance quite rapidly. They are rarely a problem outdoors nature recording as a result. It's the low frequencies that can come from a very long ways away. So, I'd have strong doubts about any masking effects. Walt |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 1. Re: mkh hiss in quiet locations..., Lou Judson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 3. Re: mkh hiss in quiet locations..., Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | 2. Re: mkh hiss in quiet locations..., Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | 2. Re: mkh hiss in quiet locations..., Walter Knapp |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU