| Subject: | 4. Re: mkh hiss in quiet locations... |
|---|---|
| From: | "Raimund Specht" animalsounds |
| Date: | Thu Sep 4, 2008 7:29 am ((PDT)) |
> Hi Raimund-- > I agree that weighting could be playing a role, > but there seems to be a lot of audible difference > to account for: > see: > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/files/ > LOG IN and scroll down to the file: > > > or > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/files/MKH-60-vs-NT1-A_R= > if you are already logged in. > > Rob D. Hi Rob, Hmmm, as far as I understand, the two samples were recorded at the same gain settings (+68dB). However, the MKH 60 is more sensitive (40mV/Pa) than the NT1-A (25mV/Pa). So, one had to attenuate the MKH60 sample by 4 dB in order to match the absolute sound levels. Raimund |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 3. Re: mkh hiss in quiet locations..., Rob Danielson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 5. Re: mkh hiss in quiet locations..., Juan Carlos Blancas Avil=E9s |
| Previous by Thread: | 3. Re: mkh hiss in quiet locations..., Rob Danielson |
| Next by Thread: | 4. Re: mkh hiss in quiet locations..., Rob Danielson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU