hi raimund and rob, thanks for your responses and info.
yes, also intuit something related with a-weigjting...
best regards,
jc
pd1. in the rough test i didn=B4t match levels, etc., what attracted
to me was the frecuency distribution of the noise...
pd2. rob, my mkh-60 manual claims for a equivalent sound
pressure level as per din 45 500 curve A of 10 dB,
and ccir 468 of 22 dB.
El 04/09/2008, a las 16:28, Raimund Specht escribi=F3:
> > Hi Raimund--
> > I agree that weighting could be playing a role,
> > but there seems to be a lot of audible difference
> > to account for:
> > see:
> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/files/
> > LOG IN and scroll down to the file:
> >
> >
> > or
> >
> >
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/files/MKH-60-vs-
>
>
> > if you are already logged in.
> >
> > Rob D.
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> Hmmm, as far as I understand, the two samples were recorded at the
> same gain settings (+68dB). However, the MKH 60 is more sensitive
> (40mV/Pa) than the NT1-A (25mV/Pa). So, one had to attenuate the MKH60
> sample by 4 dB in order to match the absolute sound levels.
>
> Raimund
>
>
|