| Subject: | 8. Re: Decca Tree? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Lou Judson" inaudio |
| Date: | Tue Sep 2, 2008 10:14 am ((PDT)) |
Umm, no again. The mid channel has all the lelemnts that the pattern of the mid mic picks up! If it it hypercardioid it will sound different from wide cardioid or omni; if it is shotgun it will have considerably different contents from the figure 8 side mic. All this debate is about common information that is available many places - spreading mis- or dis- information this way astounds me! It is like saying the moon is farther away than the sun, or the earth is flat. Much of it is simply wrong. Google MS Microphone technique and find many articles. <L> On Sep 2, 2008, at 9:44 AM, John Lundsten wrote: > Let me explain, proper MS is a coincident technique where the main > chan "M" > HAS ALL THE SOUND elements IE just like mono. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 7. Re: MS Stereo (Was Decca Tree?), Phil Tyler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 9. Re: Decca Tree?, John Lundsten |
| Previous by Thread: | 7. Re: MS Stereo (Was Decca Tree?), Phil Tyler |
| Next by Thread: | 8. Re: Decca Tree?, Greg Simmons |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU