naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Recording Gear For Installation (was Olympus LS-10 and S

Subject: Re: Recording Gear For Installation (was Olympus LS-10 and S
From: "lilyplants" lilyplants
Date: Mon Jul 7, 2008 11:47 am ((PDT))
Re: [Nature Recordists] Recording Gear For Installation (was Olympus LS-10 and S

Hum, it may be that I'll want 2 recorders since I want to walk around to get
sounds (stealth, conversations, interviews...).

I want as real as possible with open large soundstage. 
all recordings will mainly be used on web site (with headphones).
can't stand tinny or squashed sounds or wind noise 

as for the installation, I hope to have one, so I'm guessing:  the room would 
be a gallery 
(glass, concrete or wood floors, open, big). could build a room inside a room. 
could use 
an amp with head phones but already have audioengine 5 (powered) speakers.

installation will include video

I can't carry a lot due to physical limitations. I don't mind setting up 
tripods. 
thinking of doing this on a ranch where I'd have car access. but don't want to 
be limited to 
driving car in. sorry to be vague.

as for budget: I dunno. can you make some suggestions. if I get that 2 lb sony, 
I'd have to 
have another recorder, so that gets me close to a thousand.
besides the binaurals from soundpro low noise gain, I have a homemade T stereo 
wh isn't 
good and an ATM10a omnidirectional condenser mic (has a battery in handle)

do you agree with oryoki that the next best recorder option is the edirol 09hr?

thank you so much for your question and interest.
lily







--- In  Rob Danielson <> wrote:
>
> Hi Lily-- My simple answer is: Mics can matter much more than 
> recorders. Before we get into what mics and stereo rigs might work 
> well for you and then the recorder question you pose,.. Are you using 
> very high quality speakers in your installation?  Describe the 
> speakers, amps and surfaces, size of room, HVAC (acoustics) of the 
> room the installation will be in.
> .
> Do you want the  playback of the recording to be as "real" as 
> possible? Describe some other settings you want to record in addition 
> to, "a field of tall grasses." Also your recording gear budget: How 
> about $1400 for sure-fire, low-noise, spacious recordings? If not, 
> how about $420?  Do you might carrying and setting up tripods and 
> cables-- that sort of thing? Rob D.
> 
>   = = = =
> 
> At 9:45 PM +0000 7/6/08, lilyplants wrote:
> >Rob, thank you for responding to my question.
> >
> >After reading/listening to everything on the site including all the 
> >reviews and uploaded
> >recordings, I have further questions.
> >- should I return the LS-10
> >- buy the Sony PCM D-50 to try
> >- wait for a light wt. point and shoot with warm sound
> >- consider something I'm missing (don't want to buy pre amps.. new 
> >mic would be fine)
> >
> >It seems to me that the LS-10, although I LOVE the unit, won't 
> >provide the kind of
> >recording I want.
> >
> >the naturerecordists emphasize the Olympus LS-10 over the Sony PCM 
> >D-50 (is that for
> >wt. and stealth only? or are you more concerned with isolating 
> >sounds than a sound
> >environment?
> >
> >Before I return the LS. I really need some feedback on the recorders 
> >considering my needs.
> >
> >I want to do a variety of ambient sounds as well as music. For 
> >example, the sound of a
> >field of tall grasses for a sound installation; groups of people in 
> >an urban environment. Goal: a you are there feeling which involves.
> >
> >last night I recorded music from a DJ with people dancing in a room.
> >the LS is supposed to have quiet mic pre amps but I could hear an 
> >airy sound over the
> >music and people which I could not hear with my Sony MD MZ-100.
> >the LS sounded too tiny to listen to with low cut on.
> >however, using its internal mics, the LS gave nice separation 
> >between music and people. I
> >don't know if that was because of the binaural mics for the recorders.
> >
> >I very much appreciate hearing from this wonderful group before 
> >making a decision.
> >lily
> >
> >(I've tried to post a rich text message two times as a reply from 
> >Yahoo to Rob's message in
> >the thread. my new message didn't show up. what's the problem? We do 
> >need to post
> >from Yahoo don't we?)
> >
> >--- In 
> ><naturerecordists%40yahoogroups.com> 
> >Rob Danielson <type@> wrote:
> >>
> >>  At 3:48 AM +0000 7/5/08, lilyplants wrote:
> >>  >I ordered the Olympus LS-10 thinking it would be much easier to use
> >>  >than my MD Sony
> >>  >MZM100 with soundprofessional binaural mics. It is.
> >>  >
> >>  >But it doesn't seem sensitive enough (okay with on high sen, 24,
> >>  >limiter on and clip off).
> >>  >
> >>  >I want it to sound as good as possible with ambient and music. The
> >>  >Japanese warbler is much
> >>  >better recording than I have achieved.
> >>  >
> >>  >What really confuses me are the sound samples. Those Sony PCM D-50 on the
> >>  >Wingfieldaudio.com site are moving (more overtones). The choir
> >>  >sample of the LS is fatiquing
> >>  >and uninteresting. YET the samples provides on this site show both
> >>  >to be noisy although not
> >>  >as noisy as the R09 (can't remember who did them (4 "point and
> >>  >shoot" recorders).
> >>  >
> >>  >How does one account for these differences.
> >>  >and Can one achieve better results with one of these recorders 
> >>over the other?
> >>  >
> >>  >I'm new to ambient recording. Thank you for your help.
> >>  >lily
> >>
> >>  Hi Lily--
> >>  The "hi-sensitivity" setting does make make good sense for ambience
> >>  recording. Maybe turn the Limiter off? Someone who owns an LS-10
> >>  might be able to post the settings checklist they follow for
> >>  recording quieter sounds and settings. Close-mic'd music should
> >>  produce sufficient sound levels to work with.
> >  >
> >>  As for improving the performance of the LS-10, I'd definitely follow
> >  > Vicki's recent comparison tests and suggestions including using Shure
> >>  WL183 external mics. Other recordists have been posting recordings
> >>  with comments. Here's a search of "LS-10" in the list archive:
> >>  <http://tinyurl.com/5bwupr>http://tinyurl.com/5bwupr Raimund's 
> >>suggestion of using external
> >>  mics with low self-noise and very high sensitivity is a good one
> >>  though there aren't too many mics to recommend that meet these specs
> >>  that are well-suited for recording ambience.
> >>
> >>  In interpreting the samples provided in the review web sites, look
> >>  for tests done in the field using high gain (and preferably with
> >>  specified condenser mics, if external mics are used). Most of the
> >>  conditions I've come across to date are not similar to those found in
> >>  nature recording so they are not a very good indicators of the
> >>  performance you might get. Rob D.
> >>
> >>  --
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
>






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU