naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Olympus LS-10 and Sony D-50

Subject: Re: Olympus LS-10 and Sony D-50
From: "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio
Date: Sat Jul 5, 2008 12:40 am ((PDT))
At 3:48 AM +0000 7/5/08, lilyplants wrote:
>I ordered the Olympus LS-10 thinking it would be much easier to use
>than my MD Sony
>MZM100 with soundprofessional binaural mics. It is.
>
>But it doesn't seem sensitive enough (okay with on high sen, 24,
>limiter on and clip off).
>
>I want it to sound as good as possible with ambient and music. The
>Japanese warbler is much
>better recording than I have achieved.
>
>What really confuses me are the sound samples. Those Sony PCM D-50 on the
>Wingfieldaudio.com site are moving (more overtones). The choir
>sample of the LS is fatiquing
>and uninteresting. YET the samples provides on this site show both
>to be noisy although not
>as noisy as the R09 (can't remember who did them (4 "point and
>shoot" recorders).
>
>How does one account for these differences.
>and Can one achieve better results with one of these recorders over the ot=
her?
>
>I'm new to ambient recording. Thank you for your help.
>lily

Hi Lily--
The "hi-sensitivity" setting does make make good sense for ambience
recording. Maybe turn the Limiter off? Someone who owns an LS-10
might be able to post the settings checklist they follow for
recording quieter sounds and settings.  Close-mic'd music should
produce sufficient sound levels to work with.

As for improving the performance of the LS-10, I'd definitely follow
Vicki's recent comparison tests and suggestions including using Shure
WL183 external mics. Other recordists have been posting recordings
with comments.  Here's a search of "LS-10" in the list archive:
http://tinyurl.com/5bwupr  Raimund's suggestion of using external
mics with low self-noise and very high sensitivity is a good one
though there aren't too many mics to recommend that meet these specs
that are well-suited for recording ambience.

In interpreting the samples provided in the review web sites, look
for tests done in the field using high gain (and preferably with
specified condenser mics, if external mics are used).  Most of the
conditions I've come across to date are not similar to those found in
nature recording so they are not a very good indicators of the
performance you might get.  Rob D.

--









"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/

<*> Your email settings:
    Digest Email  | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    
    

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU