Subject: | 7. Re: OLYMPUS LS-10 VS DAT RECORDINGS UPLOADED |
---|---|
From: | "Max Catterwell" oatcruncher |
Date: | Sun Jun 29, 2008 2:15 am ((PDT)) |
Raimund Specht wrote: > > > However, the reason for this discrepancy is probably that Vicky used a > much lower gain setting on the LS-10 (REC LEVEL 2 instead of 10 that I > used in my test) in order to manage the loudly singing bird. High > quality professional recorders such as the SONY TCD 10 DAT usually > exhibit a better noise performance at lower gain settings. > > Excuse the ignorance of a beginner Raimund, but are you saying that a higher recording level produces less noise on the LS-10?! > Another reason might be perhaps that Vickys individual K6/ME67 > microphone creates less noise when powered via external phantom power > than with the internal battery (which is necessary with the LS-10). > This increase of noise has been reported by several users (it is > actually a fault that can be fixed by SENNHEISER). > > Does this above paragraph apply to the K6/ME66 also? Regards Max |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 6. Re: OLYMPUS LS-10 VS DAT RECORDINGS UPLOADED, Raimund Specht |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 8. Re: OLYMPUS LS-10 VS DAT RECORDINGS UPLOADED, Raimund Specht |
Previous by Thread: | 6. Re: OLYMPUS LS-10 VS DAT RECORDINGS UPLOADED, Raimund Specht |
Next by Thread: | 7. Re: OLYMPUS LS-10 VS DAT RECORDINGS UPLOADED, Raimund Specht |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU