Subject: | Re: Field test: R-09 vs. DR-1 vs. LS-10 vs. PCM-D50 |
---|---|
From: | "oryoki2000" oryoki2000 |
Date: | Tue May 27, 2008 6:24 am ((PDT)) |
Raimund, Thanks very much for sharing these recordings! Two questions: First, was the mic sensitivity set to the "high" setting for each of the recorders? The LS-10, for example, sounds a lot better when set to "low." Second, was preamp gain set as high as possible, consistent with the goal of matching record levels between the machines? --oryoki |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Looking for field recordings and nature sounds, Sudhanshu Tewari |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Field test: R-09 vs. DR-1 vs. LS-10 vs. PCM-D50, Raimund Specht |
Previous by Thread: | Field test: R-09 vs. DR-1 vs. LS-10 vs. PCM-D50, Raimund Specht |
Next by Thread: | Re: Field test: R-09 vs. DR-1 vs. LS-10 vs. PCM-D50, Raimund Specht |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU