naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Field test: R-09 vs. DR-1 vs. LS-10 vs. PCM-D50

Subject: Field test: R-09 vs. DR-1 vs. LS-10 vs. PCM-D50
From: "Raimund Specht" animalsounds
Date: Tue May 27, 2008 1:42 am ((PDT))
Last Sunday I tried to compare four of the new "point-and-shoot"
recorders with their internal mics in the field (in Berlin, Germany).
I placed them all on a stack one above the other and recorded the
following tracks simultaneously:

http://www.avisoft.com/test/R09_field.mp3
http://www.avisoft.com/test/DR-1_field.mp3
http://www.avisoft.com/test/LS-10_field.mp3
http://www.avisoft.com/test/PCM-D50_field.mp3

I tried to match the different recording levels a bit, but the results
it might not be perfect.

On the SONY PCM-D50, the mic orientation was set to 120=B0. This is the
reason why the left and right channels are audibly reversed.
Unfortunately, the sample rate on the PCM-D50 was only 22.05 kHz (I
simply forgot about that while struggling with the numerous devices).
There was a soft breeze. I therefore covered the stack of recorders
with a T-shirt in order to reduce the wind noise a bit. There is of
course still some noise originating from the reed on the left channel
(right channel on the PCM-D50).

I believe that this real-world test reveals some interesting
differences (certainly on the frequency responses of the different
microphones and the nature of their noise) but it also demonstrates
that it is quite difficult to get reliable results under field
conditions.

Regards,
Raimund





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU