5. Re: Olympus LS-10 _vs

naturerecordists

5. Re: Olympus LS-10 _vs_ Sony PCM-D50

Subject:	5. Re: Olympus LS-10 _vs_ Sony PCM-D50
From:	"Andrew Carter" standlynch
Date:	Mon May 26, 2008 1:57 am ((PDT))

--- In  "oryoki2000" <> wrote:
>
Thanks Oryoki and Akira.
That answers my memory queries! Blame Bill Gates as usual!

Umashankar wrote:
>i do not know why a 2 gb file size limit is such an issue - seeing
that >the minidisc (&dat) always had an absolute limit. i gb for hi
md, 60 or >90 minutes
>for dat.

I agree that I would not normally need more, but have a long recording
in mind for a months time, and will get what I need with 6 hrs. I
would have used a compressed recording with a MD. I note that the new
Sony can only record to wav, whilst the Olympus can record to mp3
(thanks for highlighing this Oryoki).

Andrew

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
5. Re: Olympus LS-10 _vs_ Sony PCM-D50, oryoki2000 5. Re: Olympus LS-10 _vs_ Sony PCM-D50, Andrew Carter <=

Previous by Date:	4. Re: Olympus LS-10 _vs_ Sony PCM-D50, Akira S
Next by Date:	1. Re: Olympus LS-10 _vs_ Sony PCM-D50 and Fostex FR-2LE, John Campbell
Previous by Thread:	5. Re: Olympus LS-10 _vs_ Sony PCM-D50, oryoki2000
Next by Thread:	6. Re: Olympus LS-10 _vs_ Sony PCM-D50, Rob Danielson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU