Subject: | 3. Re: Olympus LS-10 Prel. Report |
---|---|
From: | "Ray Mansell" BCTess |
Date: | Fri May 23, 2008 8:22 am ((PDT)) |
Tim Nielsen wrote: > I can try and record something today out at the ranch, where it's > fairly quiet. I don't think the LS-10 is magnitudes quieter than the > H2 though, I still hear enough noise that I'm not sure with the built- > in mics anyway, that I'd use it much for nature recording myself. > Maybe I'll setup the H2 and LS10 and do a side by side recording. That would be great - thank you so much. If, as Rob says, it turns out there is not a huge difference, then I suppose I shall have to dig deeper into my bank account. As I keep reminding my wife when she goes for 'bargains', you get what you pay for. For some reason I fail to follow my own advice :-) Thanks again, Ray |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 2. Re: Olympus LS-10 Prel. Report, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 4. Re: Olympus LS-10 Prel. Report, tim@wildecho.com |
Previous by Thread: | 2. Re: Olympus LS-10 Prel. Report, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | 4. Re: Olympus LS-10 Prel. Report, tim@wildecho.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU