Subject: | Re: ambisonic playback |
---|---|
From: | "clay" cfmspencer |
Date: | Sun May 4, 2008 8:22 am ((PDT)) |
thanks Rob. Sursound seemed over-the-top technical to me, but I'll go there. Clay On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Rob Danielson <> wrote: > At 7:55 PM +0000 5/3/08, clay wrote: > >slightly off topic? > > Hi Clay-- > Its not my place to judge for everyone, but I'd suggest OT-- not > because surround nature recording isn't of interest, but because the > technical issues are quite specialized and under rapid development > (thus quite controversial). The sursound list is one very good > resource for these questions, and their archives! ;-) Rob D. > > -- > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: ambisonic playback, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: ambisonic playback, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: ambisonic playback, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Re: ambisonic playback, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU