| Subject: | Re: FR2LE versus 702 |
|---|---|
| From: | "Curt Olson" flipov411 |
| Date: | Mon Apr 28, 2008 7:55 pm ((PDT)) |
I wrote: > Last summer I had a chance to compare my FR-2LE side by side with a SD > 722. Here's a short clip of the test recording I made. It's the dreaded indoor "tick-tock" test using a pair of AT3032 mics and each recorder in turn, with gain cranked all the way up on both recorders. It's four ticks from the FR-2LE followed by four ticks from the SD722. These are totally unprocessed raw recordings, except for the fades: 192kbps MP3: http://www.trackseventeen.com/media/tsp/fr2le-sd722.mp3 24-bit WAV: http://www.trackseventeen.com/media/tsp/fr2le-sd722.wav Curt Olson |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: FR2LE versus 702, Tim Nielsen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Used Field Recorders for Sale, uskroeger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: FR2LE versus 702, Tim Nielsen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: FR2LE versus 702, JVMNATREC@aol.com |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU