| Subject: | Re: Digital recording device |
|---|---|
| From: | "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio |
| Date: | Wed Apr 9, 2008 1:49 pm ((PDT)) |
At 10:24 AM -0500 4/9/08, Rob Danielson wrote: Sorry about the key word omission: >The [ comparison tests] are aimed at very demanding applications >such as recording >ambience in quiet locations-- not general fare. The tests use mics >with very low self-_noise_ and maximum record levels on the recorders. Rob D. -- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Digital recording device, Greg Weddig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Antarctic Ocean hydrophone streams, davem98607 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Digital recording device, Greg Weddig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MZ RH1 and downloading from previous recorders. (Was Digital rec, Philip Tyler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU