Subject: | Re: New To Field Recording - Need Microphone Recommendation |
---|---|
From: | "oryoki2000" oryoki2000 |
Date: | Tue Apr 1, 2008 8:19 am ((PDT)) |
> There are some very useful observations made > in some of the Transom reviews, but I'd be > very careful trying to apply their conclusions > to nature recording. Their conclusions often only > to the recording of robust sounds. Agreed. In fairness, the Transom site audience is people working in ENG. So close mic placement would be the norm. It's worth noting that people who don't have an interest in nature sound recording think we're silly for our focus on how a mic preamp sounds with the volume cranked all the way up. in my experience, most all digital recorder preamps have satisfactory self noise if you keep the volume at 50% of maximum. For concert recordists, the problem is often the reverse. The sound pressure level requires signal attenuation, not amplification. Different strokes, as we used to say. --oryoki |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | MicroTrack II noise measurements, Raimund Specht |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Our friends in Broadcasting (was New To Field Recording, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: New To Field Recording - Need Microphone Recommendation, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | No tango Telinga, R. Scott Vance |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU