Ted it should be in the Nat Rec archives in the last few weeks. However you
seem to be on the track of the situation. The figure I had in mind was
-120dB and I think you quote -62dB in your test.
Stuart.
_____
From:
On Behalf Of Ted Coffey
Sent: Tuesday, 9 October 2007 10:54 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Zoom H2 Self-Noise Test
Stuart,
Could you point me to Raymond's data? message number?
Ted
--- In HYPERLINK
"naturerecordists%40yahoogroups.com"=
o
m, "Stuart" <> wrote:
>
> Would I be correct in believing the Zoom recorder is about twice as
noisy as
> the figures posted by Raymond?
>
>
>
> Stuart Fairbairn.
>
> Sydney, Australia.
>
>
>
> _____
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.14.3/1054 - Release Date:
6/10/2007
> 7:12 PM
>
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.14.3/1054 - Release Date:
6/10/2007
> 7:12 PM
>
>
>
>
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.14.3/1054 - Release Date: 6/10/2007
7:12 PM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.14.3/1054 - Release Date: 6/10/2007
7:12 PM
|