naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Mic experts unite!

Subject: Re: Mic experts unite!
From: "George Paul" geopaul7
Date: Mon Jul 30, 2007 2:22 pm ((PDT))
--- In  Walter Knapp <> 
wrote:
>
> Posted by: "George Paul"
> > 
> > Questions for the microphone experts:
> > 
> > 1. What is the latest thinking on how good the Audio Technica 
3032 omni is?
> > 
> > Walt Knapp put two of them in a Crown SASS unit for me.  I have 
just come back from my 
> > first field test and will post the results in a couple of days.  
The recordings sound good, 
> > but I have no reference to compare them to.
> 
> I've only compared them to the MKH-20 in the SASS.
> 
> Compared to the MKH-20 they are not quite as detailed or clear a 
sound. 
> This would be most noticeable when recording quiet ambiance, or 
trying 
> for extra reach from the SASS. In both cases you would not be able 
to 
> clearly record as quiet a ambiance with them compared to the MKH-
20, nor 
> reach out quite so far into quiet soundfields. In louder sites the 
> detail from them is not quite as crisp and well defined as MKH-20 
as well.
> 
> Note these differences are small, they perform quite well, 
particularly 
> considering the price. Those that are not experienced with 
recording 
> with a MKH-20 SASS might not even notice the difference.
> 
> Note there is a new MKH omni due out from Sennheiser that might be 
> better than the MKH-20's. Don't know yet.
> 
> I guess the bottom line is that the AT3032 may be a good 
alternative to 
> MKH for the SASS. For those that can't get their hands on the MKH.
> 
> > 2.  What happens when mics don't perform well in humidity?
> > 
> > I will be taking the AT 3032s to a humid environment in three 
weeks.  If they don't do well 
> > down there, what will I notice?
> > 
> > stop working completely?
> > click?
> > fungus growth?
> > 
> > How will I know they are not working right?
> 
> They will continue to perform normally if working right, humidity 
> problems you can hear. Be sure and monitor your recording as you 
go. And 
> learn whats the normal sound of the mics before you go on your 
trip. 
> Crackle, sputter or hum sorts of sound are probably the most common 
> indicators of humidity problems. It may simply sound like the self 
noise 
> got louder. If bad enough you'd not want the recording from them.
> 
> Generally if they develop humidity problems they will return to 
normal 
> once they dry out. On the SASS the windscreen should help keep them 
dry 
> if it's kept dry. Would not hurt to have along some silica gel just 
in case.
> 
> Not a lot for fungus to live off of in the mics, that's a very 
> infrequent problem and then usually it's in windscreens. Frequent 
use in 
> humid environments could increase stuff depositing in the mic. But 
> nowhere near what one smoker can do to a mic.
> 
> Compared to MKH mics they are more vulnerable. MKH use a low 
voltage RF 
> frequency to polarize the mics rather than higher voltages. The 
higher 
> the voltage used in polarization the more likely humidity will be a 
problem.
> 
> I don't remember anyone reporting humidity problems, but I'm sure 
they 
> have not been used in the field enough yet to be sure. Time will 
tell 
> how durable it is in the field.
> 
> Walt
>
Thanks Walt:  I am sure the entire group benefitted from this.  

I will post my two newest recordings soon and people can listen.  
They were of some loud environments -- the Mountain treefrog, and the 
Casque headed frog.





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU