Subject: | Re: a fortunate recording |
---|---|
From: | "matthieucrocq" matthieucrocq |
Date: | Fri Jun 1, 2007 7:09 am ((PDT)) |
"Raimund Specht" <> wrote: > > Starlings imitating Oriols usually include into their songs also their > own typical chatty and raspy song structures. So, it is unlikely that > a Starling would be able to produce such a perfect imitation that also > matches the Oriol's long-term song patterns without adding any other > elements. That's a good point indeed, to which I agree: starlings are pretty good at = imitations, but they lack the discipline :-) So that's an oriole for sure. Best regards, Matthieu |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Sony Hi-MD MZ-NH900 vs MZ-RH1, portellidean |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Kookaburras, Syd Curtis |
Previous by Thread: | Sony Hi-MD MZ-NH900 vs MZ-RH1, portellidean |
Next by Thread: | Kookaburras, Syd Curtis |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU