Subject: | 1. Re: 16 Bit & 24 Bit recordings |
---|---|
From: | "John Hartog" hartogj |
Date: | Sat May 26, 2007 11:21 am ((PDT)) |
Considering you kept the pots in the same position. Would switching to 24 bit actually have given you more headroom, or would it have only lowered the noise floor? -John Hartog > Here's one example where I was recording 16/48 and 24 would have been better. I was recording a male lion roaring from 15 feet away. The > very beginning of the roar was so loud it clipped even though I had my > pots way down in anticipation. 24 bit would have given me more > headroom and would have soaked up the level much better. > > Danny > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Ithaca, New York, Walter Knapp |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 2. Re: 16 Bit & 24 Bit recordings, Danny Meltzer |
Previous by Thread: | 16 bit vs 24 bit Information Theory Hypothesis, geopaul7 |
Next by Thread: | 1. Re: 16 Bit & 24 Bit recordings, Phil Tyler |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU