I'm not the person telling facts here. Perhaps it was the other way
around or perhaps they "all" had different tricks.
I just took the opportunity to point out that those guys back there
noticed something, but couldn't really explain it and therefore were
considered ignorant outsiders and ridiculed. Not until now we perhaps
have the knowledge to understand what they were doing.
I though it was possible that some members involved here had
something to learn from that...
Klas.
At 15:29 2007-05-23, you wrote:
> > So.. there was a possible sense in what those guys did, back
> > then, when they copied their digital tracks to their Ampex and back?
> > Covered some digital noise with tape hiss and modulation noise? Is
> > that possible?
> > I mean, they were terribly ridiculed, still perhaps right, but in a
> > way that we didn't understand at the time?
>
>shouldn't they have done that the other way round - get the tape hiss
>onto the analogue signal before the A/D conversion which then acts to
>dither the signal? Quantisation distortion once added can never be
>removed...
>
>
>
>"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
>sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
Telinga Microphones, Botarbo,
S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden.
Phone & fax int + 295 310 01
email:
website: www.telinga.com
|