| Subject: | 2. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings |
|---|---|
| From: | "Scott Fraser" scottbfraser |
| Date: | Wed May 23, 2007 8:38 am ((PDT)) |
<<The vast majority of people do not find CD quality "ugly">> Then again, the vast majority of people have no ear training & find MP3 quality acceptable. Scott Fraser |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 1. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, stoatwizard |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 3. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, Klas Strandberg |
| Previous by Thread: | 2. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, Paul Jacobson |
| Next by Thread: | 3. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, Raimund Specht |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU