naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

1. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings

Subject: 1. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings
From: "stoatwizard" stoatwizard
Date: Wed May 23, 2007 6:29 am ((PDT))
> So.. there was a possible sense in what those guys did, back
> then,  when they copied their digital tracks to their Ampex and back?
> Covered some digital noise with tape hiss and modulation noise? Is
> that possible?
> I mean, they were terribly ridiculed, still perhaps right, but in a
> way that we didn't understand at the time?

shouldn't they have done that the other way round - get the tape hiss
onto the analogue signal before the A/D conversion which then acts to
dither the signal? Quantisation distortion once added can never be
removed...





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU