| Subject: | 1. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings |
|---|---|
| From: | "Walter Knapp" waltknapp |
| Date: | Tue May 22, 2007 5:41 am ((PDT)) |
Posted by: "Raimund Specht" > the (ugly) quantization noise > of the 16 bit format. The vast majority of people do not find CD quality "ugly" Maybe folks need some perspective and some restraint in use of such terms.... Walt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Sennheiser MKH-8000 Series, Walter Knapp |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, stoatwizard |
| Previous by Thread: | File uploaded-Purple Finch, Debbi B |
| Next by Thread: | 1. Re: 24 bit vs 16 bit recordings, stoatwizard |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU